Yes. We modify and extend E3D catalog structures to match your project specifications, material codes, and procurement standards. This includes creating custom catalog components, adjusting spec-driven selection rules, and aligning catalog naming with your ERP material masters. In our work on O&G projects, proper catalog alignment eliminated the mismatch between what engineers selected in E3D and what procurement needed in SAP.

PML development is one of our core capabilities. We write macros and appware for automated modeling tasks, batch operations, custom validation sequences, drawing generation, and reporting. Our PML work ranges from single-function productivity scripts to full appware modules that extend E3D’s standard capabilities for project-specific workflows.

We’ve delivered this exact integration. For a midstream gas processing plant, we built a bi-directional sync between the CAD environment and SAP S/4HANA – automating BoM transfer, asset registration, and material classification. The result: error rates dropped from 15% to under 2%, handover time went from 6+ weeks to 1 week, and the client saved approximately $120,000 per year in engineering labor alone.

We build automated consistency-checking tools that continuously compare P&ID definitions in AVEVA Diagrams against the E3D model. These tools flag mismatches in line sizes, specs, equipment references, instrument assignments, and connection points – during design, not during review. Combined with tag synchronisation and change propagation workflows, this approach catches discrepancies when they’re cheap to fix rather than after they’ve cascaded into procurement errors or site rework.